Have you ever written a book review?

Thursday, February 5, 2009

The Head of Socialism is Rearing. I Refuse to Bow

Someone mentioned Atlas Shrugged in a comment, which triggered me to recall my favorite part of the book.

I am a business founder. I pay employees. I have to make a profit. I am awake at night worrying about this and contemplating that. I have to deal with all the bullshit from government interference in my business and private life. From people who have never managed anything, have never had to produce, or compete, or make payroll or be better, faster, and smart than the next guy. Or live under the rules they make us, the producers, slave under. Oh, and I pay my taxes.

Since I am also an attorney, this scene from Atlas Shrugged is when the character Hank Reardon, a steel magnate, is on trial for not "sharing" his discovery of a better steel with "the people." His words are directed to the court.

No, I do not want my attitude to be misunderstood. I shall be glad to state it for the record. I am in full agreement with the facts of everything said about me in the newspapers - with the facts, but not with the evaluation.

I work for nothing but my own profit - which I make by selling a product they need to men who are willing and able to buy it. I do not produce it for their benefit at the expense of mine, and they do not buy it for my benefit at the expense of theirs; I do not sacrifice my interests to them nor do they sacrifice theirs to me; we deal as equals by mutual consent to mutual advantage - and I am proud of every penny that I have earned in this manner.

I am rich and I am proud of every penny I own. I made my money by my own effort, in free exchange and through the voluntary consent of every man I dealt with - voluntary consent of those who employed me when I started, the voluntary consent of those who work for me now, the voluntary consent of those who buy my product.

I shall answer all the questions you are afraid to ask me openly. Do I wish to pay my workers more than their services are worth to me? I do not.

Do I wish to sell my product for less than my customers are willing to pay me? I do not.

Do I wish to sell it at a loss or give it away? I do not.

If this is evil, do whatever you please about me, according to whatever standards you hold. These are mine. I am earning my own living, as every honest man must. I refuse to accept as guilt the fact of my own existence and the fact that I must work in order to support it.

I refuse to accept as guilt the fact that I am able to do it better than most people - the fact that my work is of greater value than the work of my neighbours and that more men are willing to pay me.

I refuse to apologise for my ability - I refuse to apologise for my success - I refuse to apologise for my money. If this is evil, make the most of it. If this is what the public finds harmful to its interests, let the public destroy me. This is my code - and I will accept no other.

I could say to you that I have done more good for my fellow men than you can ever hope to accomplish - but I will not say it, because I do not seek the good of others as a sanction for my right to exist, nor do I recognise the good of others as a justification for their seizure of my property or their destruction of my life.

I will not say that the good of others was the purpose of my work - my own good was my purpose, and I despise the man who surrenders his. I could say to you that you do not serve the public good - that nobody's good can be achieved at the price of human sacrifices - that when you violate the rights of one man, you have violated the right of all, and a public of rightless creatures is doomed to destruction.

I could say to you that you will and can achieve nothing but universal devastation - as any looter must, when he runs out of victims. I could say it, but I won't. It is not your particular policy that I challenge, but your moral premise. If it were true that men could achieve their good by means of turning some men into sacrificial animals, and I were asked to immolate myself for the sake of creatures who wanted to survive at the price of my blood, if I were asked to serve the interests of society apart from, above and against my own - I would refuse. I would reject it as the most contemptible evil, I would fight it with every power I possess, I would fight the whole of mankind, if one minute were all I could last before I were murdered, I would fight in the full confidence of the justice of my battle and of a living being's right to exist.

Let there be no misunderstanding about me. If it is now the belief of my fellow men, who call themselves the public, that their good requires victims, then I say: The public good be damned, I will have no part of it!"


Anonymous said...

Once upon a time, before most of us were born, ATLAS SHRUGGED was a compelling 'What if...?'

Now it's a dated 'So what?'


Mark Hughes said...

My wife’s sister married a man from a European country that shall remain nameless. She moved there some years ago. There the government assigns the housing. Medical care is “free” but it took her over two months to be admitted to a hospital for treatment of a serious condition. More government is not the answer.

Mark Hughes
Author of The New Civil War Handbook – due out Spring 2009

Anonymous said...

Angelina Jolie is attached to the ATLAS SHRUGGED movie project.

Too bad, I was hoping for Anne Coulter.

Anonymous said...

"Better steel," eh?

The 1957 launch of Sputnik was also called, of all things, 'The deathknell of Lionel Trains, those traditional toys circling a million Christmas trees.

The Internet may not be 'the deathknell of publishing,' but circling the Christmas tree is no way to make it go away.


Anonymous said...

History books, strictly as info volumes or data blocks, are as much history as the horse.

Information, no matter how well written and spun, is not enough.

The 'better' books, the books that will stand alone on the shelf while so many others will have wilted away, are those that give us inspiration and insight, a fresh perspective on how vital and alive history was always meant to be.

"He who ignores the past condemns the future."


Mark said...

Actually, I think most people would agree with the sentiment that the writer expresses. No doubt that the honesty is refreshing.